j/r debating is way overrated. i'm stoic in my conviction of the author (as well i should be), but you think what you want. they said on the site that they were going to IM me or zac in the near future, and today i was online talking to a few people when one of those boxes popped up, like they "they're not on your list but do you want to accept the message anyway?" box, and i exited out of it by accident, and they didn't try again... sooo i'm guessing it was j or r. DO try again. i like how now we have animosity. ha. i read somewhere online "arguing online is like the special olympics: even if you win you're still retarded." and i liked it. whatever, i'm not too worried about it, it's just fucking blogging.
i guess what it comes down to is that what i or zac writes about is pertinent to ourselves primarily and our friends secondarily. if you're neither, then it has no relevence other than nosiness (which i understand, completely), and also, if you don't partake in some of the activities that zac and i (and many of our friends) do, maybe it wouldn't be interesting. i don't like the condescending thing, though. drinking does not demonstrate a decisive lack of character or moral fiber... perhaps only a different set of morals. i'm sure things that these sxe (and even not sxe, but non-practicing) people do, i would think sucks. if that makes sense... anyways..
i also wanted to kind on comment on something janis was saying, where she was talking about how guys suck or whatever. i have to disagree. i think that guys have it so hard: basically they are expected to take the first move. i know so many girls that will not be the first one to do something.. they think that the guy should. i'm not saying that that's a WRONG way to act, but it's expecting a lot. i mean, if we won't do it, why would they? cause they can take rejection better? to whoever gets rejected, it sucks. also they have to pretend not to care a lot,,, that whole insensitivity thing. and maybe some of them actually DON'T care (we can pass the examination of the male mind on to zac, maybe) but it still seems weird to me to be expected to hold so much in. girls are always expected to overflow and talk about everything (and we do). it's not their job to do anything, nor ours... it's more like both people being honest and going for it. so do that, go for it. (like the drawing on my picture in math class.. go for it... if the vibes are there, then..., we only have 7 months left). i think i'm going to edit this later when i've collected my thoughts...
sam: emory boards don't really do it for me, but way to tell the world you love them... good for you. however, NOT good for you for liking avril. AVRIL? i'm more badass than she is, give me a break. and her music isn't even good in a pop kind of way. BOI (which is so wrong in it's own right) does not rhyme with BOI. it's that simple. lastly, in response to another of your posts. roxie is definitely not katey. i know this on several accounts. katey wouldn't do that anonymous shit. she HAS a personal blog--which is just that, personal, ie, she's not giving you the address-- and she does have this new public one. also, i'm so strong in my conviction of the actual roxie (not being katey, obviously) that i WILL bet on it. no one has accepted a bet yet. c'mon.
so i got my board, it's a used one, so i can not worry about it too much...grey with purple on the bottom... a liquid, if that means anything to you boarders. and black boots (airwalks??? i have no idea), and seth is kind enough to give me bindings! this adds to my non-hate of him, despite what he may or may not think. i'm psyched to start, even if that basically means a lot of bruises and shit.
snow days are so much better than school....so let's have one
